“Red States” may make their poor poorer. Thanks, GOP!

Not many noticed, with all the latest news storms from Ukraine and the Middle East, but something happened in the courts on the East Coast of the US. Two specific ones, actually: US Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit and the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit. This may have a huge bearing on the low-income populations of the Republican-dominated States that refuse to participate in the ACA exchanges’ program. Specifically – it may make the poor people much poorer. Or sicker. Or both.

Continue reading

Posted in News and Politics, Taxes - General | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Twitter drones – are you one of them? Part 2.

This is post is a sequel for my previous post about my experiment with Twitter channels “#GazaUnderAttack” and “#IsraelUnderAttack”. In this post I’ll describe the discussions I had with “Joe”, the only responsive and coherent real user who responded to me from the “Palestinian” (“#GazaUnderAttack”) channel.

Continue reading

Posted in News and Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 6 Comments

Twitter drones – are you one of them? Part 1.

My previous post about the Israeli-Palestinian clashes has caught some attention and brought me to twitter for more than just posting links to my articles. I decided to take a deeper look at what’s going on there with regards to actual, or perceived, news reporting. Specifically I decided to take a look at the #GazaUnderAttack and #IsraelUnderAttack channels.

First, my methodology. Pretty simple actually, I just chose random users from each of the channels that I saw and send them questions contrary to their expressed opinions. Devil’s advocate, if you may.

Continue reading

Posted in News and Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Nothing new in the Middle East. What about the news?

It is summer again, and as usual – there’s another little war going on between Israel and the Palestinians. P’s are throwing rockets indiscriminately all around Israel, I’s are bombing headquarters and weapons’ storage facilities in Gaza ignoring the human shields, and the reporters and the propagandists are having a party.

But what’s new in the reports? Apparently nothing. While Israel is reusing it’s posters published during the last couple of rounds on the IDF Facebook feed, the Palestinians are also reusing the images of their dead and wounded. From the previous rounds, and some even from totally different places – like the conflicts in Syria and Iraq. You can also see the floods of automated propaganda messages, most of them very hateful and unbased on facts, all around – from both sides, but mostly from the Palestinian side.

What does it mean to us, consumers, news consumers, in this case?

1. Everybody lies. After all, Hugh Laurie said that, it must be true. And it is. Everything you read, especially in the “Comments” section, but also in the actual (but many times not factual) news reports should be taken with a grain of salt. And blogs, including this one. They’re all biased, affected by personal opinions, preferences and beliefs.

2. News reports are not necessarily facts. Many times they’re not. Sometimes because the reporters are mislead, sometimes (Fox News) because they’re not interested in reporting, but rather preaching. This definitely includes the Arab-Israeli conflict.

3. What you see is not always what you get. When you see a picture or a video – many times you’re not aware of the context. You’re shown a kid beaten by cops – but you don’t see that kid taking part in a violent riot with rocks and Molotov cocktails thrown at these cops beforehand. You’re shown a picture of a dying baby, but you’re not told that the baby is dying because of wounds inflicted by his own party. Sometimes the baby is not even from the area or time and occasionally (as I have shown in this blog during the last round of the Israeli-Palestinian clashes) – the baby may very well be from the opposite side.

So what to do?


Sometimes it is hard, you may be too lazy, or just not care enough. But if you care enough to form an opinion – think before you do.

Consider this:

Palestinians claim Israel occupies their land, yet the attacks against Israel come from Gaza where there’s not a single Israeli.

Palestinians claim Israel blockades Gaza, yet they have amassed thousands of long-range missiles and various weapons. Why have they not put the resources into building their own independent state? Who benefits from such a behavior? Who encourages it? Why?

Palestinians claim Israel terrorizes them and harms civilians, yet it is the Palestinians who call for these civilians to show up at places which Israel notified ahead of time it intends to attack. If they don’t care about their lives – why should you? Do people who encourage their children to stand under the bombs have any moral right to cry about these children after the bombs fall?

On the other side of the equation, you find a country being bombarded daily by rockets which deliberately target civilian areas, for the sole reason of killing people and spreading fear. That is, by definition, terrorism. Surprisingly, this is done by those from Gaza – the land not occupied by anyone which is completely free to declare its own independence. These attacks do not come from the West Bank, which may have some basis for claims of occupation.

Now think  – why is this? Why is it that the “West Bank” Palestinians stay on the sidelines, or outright condemn, their “brothers” from Gaza? Why is it that in Gaza it is easier to get weapons than medicine? How is it that even when Israel is under fire from Gaza – it is still providing Gaza with food, medicine, fuel? If that’s blockade – then Israel sucks at it.

If you really want to form your own opinion – go to Israel and see things for yourself. Try not to take part in riots, but do feel free to roam the country and see what’s going on. Think for yourself, don’t let people feed you opinions.
You don’t believe me? Good. Check, verify, and you will find the truth, not what people want you to believe.

Your Little Advisor.

Posted in News and Politics | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

In case you’ve missed – some updates from eBay and Amazon

Those of us who use the Amazon marketplace and eBay, should pay attention to the following changes:

1. eBay recently announced the new Global Shipping Program. This program allows you to ship your items to foreign buyers without shipping internationally or worrying of items disappearing in transit. You ship to eBay center in the US and they’ll take care of the rest.

However, Global Shipping Program (GSP) overrides your exclusions list. So if you do not want to sell your items to people in certain countries – using the GSP will override these exclusions and people from these countries will be able to buy your items.

What should you do? You need to protectively opt-out of the override. You can opt-out from GSP entirely, or go here to specifically opt-out of the override feature. You can also do this through this location in your account settings: My eBay > Account > Site Preferences > Shipping Preferences.

2. eBay also announced that several listing categories, you’ll be able to list up to 100 auction-style listings without insertion fees. However, for fixed-price listings you’ll have to pay $0.30 per listing unless you have a store subscription. See more details here.

3. Amazon also announced that starting of August 1st, US coins, bulions and mint sets can only be sold through a “collector store”. You can apply for such a store here, if you qualify. However, to qualify you must be a member of NGC, PCGS, PNG or ICTA. Members of other organizations (like ANA, PNNA, FUN) can only apply if they’re also members of one of the first four. The meaning of this qualification requirement is that small-scale individual collectors are effectively barred from selling on Amazon. Welcome to eBay.

Happy selling,

Your Little Advisor

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

In Rialto the Holocaust has never happened…

Most major outlets mentioned it only briefly, but the same month when the Israelis commemorate the death of more than half of the Jewish population of the world in the Holocaust, the California’s Rialto teachers decided to give their students a “critical thinking” assignment – denying it.

You can read more here, or here, or even here. But not here.

I can’t say what bothers me more…Is it the fact that the “critical thinking” exercise of denial is targeting one of the most documented and most heinous crimes in the human history?… Is it the fact that the question formulated to guide the students towards the ever antisemitic claim that Jews only care about money and gains?… Or is it the obvious bias of the board administrators against Jews in general and Israel in particular?..

Interim superintendent, named Mohammed Islam, and his spokesperson, named Sayeda Jafri, were very apologetic. They said that they didn’t receive any complaints from the parents or teachers. Friendly crowd, apparently.

Rialto is about an hour drive from Los Angeles, home to the Simon Wiesenthal Center - an organization founded by the Nobel Peace Prize nominee Simon Wiesenthal, a holocaust survivor and a Nazi hunter. I’m sure they could have helped the teachers with some education materials and topics to encourage the students’ critical thinking abilities without asking the students to justify denying facts. Was one hour drive or even a phone call such a hard task for Mr. Islam?

One would wonder how these people get to a position where they can poison children’s minds, but America is apparently too politically correct for such questions to be asked in the mainstream media.

I advise you to think long and hard when you’re electing your representatives to the school boards next time.

Your Little Advisor, who had personally met and spoke with the people who had numbers tattooed on their hands.

Posted in News and Politics | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Something about free speach and tolerance…

Mozilla’s newly appointed CEO, Brendan Eich, resigned yesterday. Apparently, it is not always clear to people where the the freedom of speech and the tolerance end and acceptance begins.

Eich was definitely in his right to give $1000 to the Prop 8 campaign, and was definitely in his right to voice his opposition to other people having the same rights as him. After all, it wouldn’t be a free country otherwise.

What other people have is exactly the same – they have the right to voice their opinion, their opposition to Eich’s behavior and their desire not to use products developed by the company he’s the face of.

Boycotting companies for the opinions of their owners/CEO’s is not news. Some people decide to boycott companies because they’re owned/led by bigots, others decide to support these companies for that same reason. Check the Chick-Fil-A story – enough said.

But apparently, it is only allowed to use the power of the dollar when it is for the “right” cause. When the boycott of Mozilla drives Eich out, it is apparently bullying and intolerance that was the reason, not Eich’s own actions.

So let me educate you on the difference between “Free Speech“, “Tolerance” and “Acceptance“:

1. Free speech – you’re free to say as you like. No law can prevent you from saying whatever you want. Some laws may punish you if by saying things you’re causing significant damage (like, for example, exposing the NSA surveillance program…), but you’re still free to say it. You must accept the responsibility for what you say. That’s free speech.

2. Tolerance – people who’re tolerant will not try to actively preventing you from speaking out your mind. For example, you won’t see gays pushing laws to forbid preaching bigotry or forcing churches to discuss Darwinism and Creationalism as two equal theories. Gay people tolerate Eich’s opinions, even if his opinions (and actions) come to strip gay people of their equal rights. No-one demanded Eich to be put in prison. That’s tolerance.

3. Acceptance – accepting one’s opinion means living/acting by them. While Eich’s is free to say what he wants, and I’m tolerant to him saying that, I’m in no way obligated to accept what he’s saying. Thus, the fact that I oppose his opinions doesn’t mean that I’m against his free speech or not tolerant – it means I do not accept. That’s acceptance.

Same goes both ways – In California, and many other states, gay marriages are (now) legal. It is the gay people’s free speech right to get married (declare in public their love to their partner and willingness to share their lives together), it is everyone else tolerance not to interfere and let them live their lives as they want. But everyone else doesn’t have to accept that opinion and rush into gay marriage themselves. No-one was forcing Mr. Eich to marry another man when he was contributing money to Prop 8. He was not forced to accept anyone’s else opinion. He was merely asked to tolerate it. He was not willing to. He was willing to force his belief on others, force gay people to accept his way of life through law.

And now he’s paid the price for that. And its free market: if I don’t want to use Mozilla products – I won’t. Same as me never stepping foot at the neighborhood Chick-Fil-A.

Think about this,

Your Little Advisor.

Posted in News and Politics | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment